* * *
The worst may be yet to come.
“That storm has not yet hit,” Frank Alexander, a professor and housing law expert at Emory University, said of the looming decline in property tax revenues, which he and others agree will last years. “It’s beginning in 2011, but it’s really going to hit in 2012 and 2013.”
--------------------
The perfessor will predict this means any new residential construction will necessarily involve mandatory membership homeowner associations to help take the strain off local government finances. There's a large degree of irony at work here. The inflation of the housing bubble drove the growth of Privatopia since local governments weren't about to willingly absorb the infrastructure and other costs to service a multitude of new residential "communities." Now that the bubble as popped in the very places where Privatopia boomed from 1999 to 2006 such as Underwater (nee "Fabulous") Las Vegas, they're likely to be just as inclined -- if not more so -- to require all new residential development be of the common interest variety.
2 comments:
There is NO need for an HOA but for CONTROL.
Public Improvement Districts and Municipal Utility Districts are examples of financing mechanisms where the local government foists off all financial responsibility for infrastructure while taxing the residents within the district. The districts are another layer of taxation with tasks more directed at infrastructure and traditional governmental functions. However, these districts are political subdivisions of the state and as such there are constitutional restraints on their exercise of authority.
What inevitably happens, however, is that in addition to the PID or MUD, the property will be saddled with "involuntary membership" in a private corporation - an HOA. Why? The infrastructure and other functions can be and typically will be handled by other financing mechanisms. The only purpose of the HOA is to extend unconstitutional control over the property and personage of the people that will reside in the area.
There is NO need for an HOA but for CONTROL.
Public Improvement Districts and Municipal Utility Districts are examples of financing mechanisms where the local government foists off all financial responsibility for infrastructure while taxing the residents within the district. The districts are another layer of taxation with tasks more directed at infrastructure and traditional governmental functions. However, these districts are political subdivisions of the state and as such there are constitutional restraints on their exercise of authority.
What inevitably happens, however, is that in addition to the PID or MUD, the property will be saddled with "involuntary membership" in a private corporation - an HOA. Why? The infrastructure and other functions can be and typically will be handled by other financing mechanisms. The only purpose of the HOA is to extend unconstitutional control over the property and personage of the people that will reside in the area.
Post a Comment