A challenge to cut signs
My family and I live in Lindenhurst, in Lake County, IL. We have village council election coming up. The incumbents are unpopular because they were all set to embrace a big mixed use development project that involved a TIF district, and at the last minute they encountered massive public opposition to the TIF and were forced to back down. None of them seemed to have the slightest idea how a TIF worked, but they were swept up in the developer's rhetoric about how great it was. And it was...for the developer. The school districts and other taxing bodies would have taken it in the neck. The public figured it out before their "leaders" did, and the school district were going to sue (and probably win) because the area subject to the TIF wasn't really "blighted" as the statute requires. The outcry produced a slate of challengers for the incumbents' council seats, and my guess is that on election day the incumbents will be toast. I think they know that. So now, the incumbents have come up with a brilliant strategy: they have proposed a joint agreement between the two slates not to use any yard or roadside campaign signs. Of course, the challengers will have none of it, because they need the signs to generate name recognition and demonstrate their level of support in the community. That's what yard and road signs are for, and that's why municipalities are prohibited from banning them (per the US Supreme Court). That's also why HOAs should be legally prohibited from banning them. And it is exactly why the incumbents want a sign-free campaign--so they can have the name recognition advantage. They don't admit that, of course. It's all about aesthetics, you see. Right. See you on election day.

Lindenhurst village board incumbents have asked their challengers to reduce environmental pollution by not using yard and roadside campaign signs. The request was made in a letter sent to mayoral challenger Susan Lahr by the incumbent’s slate, the Lindenhurst Community Party. “People get upset with signs, especially campaign signs,” said Mayor James Betustak. “If they agree not to put them up, we will, too. “If they don’t agree, then we will have to decide what to do. It is tough to not have campaign signs when your opponents do.” Lahr said her slate’s platform is to foster open and frequent communication. “We feel that yard signs are a means of informing residents that there is a choice,” she said. If the Community Party is worried about the environment, Lahr said, they should further investigate light and noise pollution the Village Green development would create. Village Green is a multi-use development proposed for the northwest corner of routes 45 and 132 that includes more than 400,000 square feet of retail space and multi- and single-family housing. It is likely to be a key issue in the race.