Legal Tales from Gilligan's Island
This is a law review article. One of the few worth reading. Santa Clara Law Review Volume 39, Number 1 (1998).
Gilligan's Island, a 1960s comedy, ranks among the most influential television shows of all time. Despite the fact that the last original episode aired thirty years ago, the show is more popular now than when it first appeared. Each day, reruns bring the characters back to life, and it is claimed that the show has been presented more often than any other television comedy.
Although the series has been the subject of numerous studies, its legal facets are almost never mentioned. As a result, even the show's most ardent fans are rarely mindful of just how much law appeared in the series. Accordingly, this essay seeks to shed some light on the jurisprudence of Gilligan's Island.
Saturday, April 30, 2005
NJ HOA limits flag display despite protective statute, says homeowner
From a reader who wishes to remain anonymous out of concern over retribution. Any New Jersey attorney who would like to help this individual vindicate his/her rights can contact me and I'll facilitate putting you together. For example, a New Jersey CAI attorney who believes in the rule of law and would like to demonstrate that CAI cares about owners, not just boards of directors, might want to do this pro bono.
My Homeowners Association limits public display of the
American flag, despite a NJ law prohibiting such limitation
(45NJSA:22A-48.1). The HOA also acts as judge and jury for anyone who complains that their actions are unfair. There is apparently no legal recourse against a
Homeowners Association in NJ or any state, as these little fiefdoms
have been established as private governments who answer to nobody
but themselves.
Name Withheld
New Jersey
From a reader who wishes to remain anonymous out of concern over retribution. Any New Jersey attorney who would like to help this individual vindicate his/her rights can contact me and I'll facilitate putting you together. For example, a New Jersey CAI attorney who believes in the rule of law and would like to demonstrate that CAI cares about owners, not just boards of directors, might want to do this pro bono.
My Homeowners Association limits public display of the
American flag, despite a NJ law prohibiting such limitation
(45NJSA:22A-48.1). The HOA also acts as judge and jury for anyone who complains that their actions are unfair. There is apparently no legal recourse against a
Homeowners Association in NJ or any state, as these little fiefdoms
have been established as private governments who answer to nobody
but themselves.
Name Withheld
New Jersey
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel Online: Their own set of rules: Cheesehead state wants condo buyers to know what they're getting into
Today, Wisconsin begins an effort to reduce squabbles by requiring condominium associations to provide potential buyers with an "executive summary" of governing principles before a contract is signed. It's the seller's responsibility to get the summary to potential buyers.
Today, Wisconsin begins an effort to reduce squabbles by requiring condominium associations to provide potential buyers with an "executive summary" of governing principles before a contract is signed. It's the seller's responsibility to get the summary to potential buyers.
You can't hide your lying eyes from devices: thermal imaging to detect lies?
This is kind of creepy.
This is kind of creepy.
Friday, April 29, 2005
More HOA reforms near OK--East Valley Tribune
"Your Valhalla Neighbors" kindly sent the link to the story on AZ HOA reforms that I noted earlier--thanks.
"Your Valhalla Neighbors" kindly sent the link to the story on AZ HOA reforms that I noted earlier--thanks.
Boing Boing: Designer prefab houses coming to Germany
Mystery Reader sent this link to a Boing Boing story on a type of house that I hope stays wherever it is at the moment. Take a look at the picture.
Mystery Reader sent this link to a Boing Boing story on a type of house that I hope stays wherever it is at the moment. Take a look at the picture.
WSOCTV.com - Action 9 - Action 9: Woman Paid HOA Dues, But They Still Wanted Legal Fees
Yet another story of a homeowner treated like so much garbage by her HOA and the HOA's attorney. According to the story (I have no independent knowledge of what happened), this owner wasn't delinquent and had the receipts to prove it, but the association's lawyer threatened to foreclose if the owner didn't pay the lawyer's fees for the bogus collection effort. Enter the TV station:
CHARLOTTE, N.C. -- Betty Belk said she paid her homeowner's dues on time, but through a clerical mistake, the homeowner's association still wanted to collect on legal fees...Attorneys do have the right to recover fees incurred in the collection of delinquent homeowners dues. But if Belk's dues were never late, then how could the attorney, in this case Victoria Sprouse, still collect her fees? "I said, 'I don't think that's right.' She said, 'You got to pay that or I'll foreclose on your house,'" said Belk. "That's when I got in touch with you." Action 9 contacted attorney Victoria Sprouse. She promised she would talk about what happened but never did.The homeowner's association's management company, Carolina Management Association also wouldn't talk to Action 9. Pat Patterson of Carolina Management told Belk she didn't have to pay the attorney fees.
---------------------
According to the community association industry, things like this never happen. Sure--maybe there's another side to this. With the association's attorney not speaking to the press I don't know. But when will the Community Associations Institute take a meaningful stand against apparent collections and foreclosure abuse by associations and their attorneys? All I hear are platitudes about how foreclosure should be a last resort and denials that there is a problem. Every case is an "isolated instance." How about some action, such a as a CAI attorney providing pro bono legal assistance to people like Betty Belk so the case can be fully and fairly presented on both sides? Owners can't even get representation because (a) they can't afford it, and (b) even if they could nearly all HOA specialists only represent associations. CAI could remedy this, and they should. And if they don't, legislatures will do something about it, and I think HOA lawyers won't like the outcome of that process.
Yet another story of a homeowner treated like so much garbage by her HOA and the HOA's attorney. According to the story (I have no independent knowledge of what happened), this owner wasn't delinquent and had the receipts to prove it, but the association's lawyer threatened to foreclose if the owner didn't pay the lawyer's fees for the bogus collection effort. Enter the TV station:
CHARLOTTE, N.C. -- Betty Belk said she paid her homeowner's dues on time, but through a clerical mistake, the homeowner's association still wanted to collect on legal fees...Attorneys do have the right to recover fees incurred in the collection of delinquent homeowners dues. But if Belk's dues were never late, then how could the attorney, in this case Victoria Sprouse, still collect her fees? "I said, 'I don't think that's right.' She said, 'You got to pay that or I'll foreclose on your house,'" said Belk. "That's when I got in touch with you." Action 9 contacted attorney Victoria Sprouse. She promised she would talk about what happened but never did.The homeowner's association's management company, Carolina Management Association also wouldn't talk to Action 9. Pat Patterson of Carolina Management told Belk she didn't have to pay the attorney fees.
---------------------
According to the community association industry, things like this never happen. Sure--maybe there's another side to this. With the association's attorney not speaking to the press I don't know. But when will the Community Associations Institute take a meaningful stand against apparent collections and foreclosure abuse by associations and their attorneys? All I hear are platitudes about how foreclosure should be a last resort and denials that there is a problem. Every case is an "isolated instance." How about some action, such a as a CAI attorney providing pro bono legal assistance to people like Betty Belk so the case can be fully and fairly presented on both sides? Owners can't even get representation because (a) they can't afford it, and (b) even if they could nearly all HOA specialists only represent associations. CAI could remedy this, and they should. And if they don't, legislatures will do something about it, and I think HOA lawyers won't like the outcome of that process.
Illinois Supreme Court decision allows non-lawyers to handle real estate transactions
There is a major battle underway between the organized bar and mortgage companies over having the lender's non-lawyer employees handle parts of real estate sales transactions. Here in this case the Illinois Supreme Court hands a big loss to the lawyers, despite numerous amicus briefs:
The parties have identified several issues for our review: (1) whether a mortgage lender that uses nonlawyers to prepare loan documents for the lender's loans engages in the unauthorized practice of law when the lender charges the borrower a fee for preparation of the documents; (2) whether a private right of action to recover money damages exists under the Attorney Act (705 ILCS 205/0.01 et seq. (West 2002)); (3) whether plaintiffs' complaints stated a cause of action under the Consumer Fraud Act; (4) whether a private right of action for money had and received due to fees charged in this case exists and whether the voluntary payment doctrine bars plaintiffs from seeking restitution; and (5) whether federal law preempts plaintiffs' state law claims against defendant national bank and federal savings associations.
------------
In summary, we hold that where the defendant lenders prepared the subject loan documents, through their employees, they did not engage in the unauthorized practice of law by charging a fee. We also hold that no private right of action exists under the Attorney Act for damages for the unauthorized practice of law. We further hold that plaintiffs' restitution claims in the Jackson and Porter cases are barred by the voluntary payment doctrine. Accordingly, for the reasons stated, we affirm the judgments of the appellate court.
----------------------
Why is this significant, apart from the continued threat to the income of attorneys? Because of the rise of common interest housing and the inclusion in housing sales of a package of privatized services, responsibilities, and restrictions--all of which need to be fully understood by the buyer, which requires a lawyer to explain them. I think buyers need to be fully informed of how CC&Rs and an HOA or condo association will affect their expectations of home ownership. I'd like to see more lawyer involvement in explaining these documents, not less. These non-lawyer employees are not qualified, or allowed, to interpret or explain things. Having mortgage company employees doing what lawyers would otherwise do just increases the pressure to get the whole transaction over with as speedily as possible without bothering to secure full understanding by the buyer of what he or she is getting into.
There is a major battle underway between the organized bar and mortgage companies over having the lender's non-lawyer employees handle parts of real estate sales transactions. Here in this case the Illinois Supreme Court hands a big loss to the lawyers, despite numerous amicus briefs:
The parties have identified several issues for our review: (1) whether a mortgage lender that uses nonlawyers to prepare loan documents for the lender's loans engages in the unauthorized practice of law when the lender charges the borrower a fee for preparation of the documents; (2) whether a private right of action to recover money damages exists under the Attorney Act (705 ILCS 205/0.01 et seq. (West 2002)); (3) whether plaintiffs' complaints stated a cause of action under the Consumer Fraud Act; (4) whether a private right of action for money had and received due to fees charged in this case exists and whether the voluntary payment doctrine bars plaintiffs from seeking restitution; and (5) whether federal law preempts plaintiffs' state law claims against defendant national bank and federal savings associations.
------------
In summary, we hold that where the defendant lenders prepared the subject loan documents, through their employees, they did not engage in the unauthorized practice of law by charging a fee. We also hold that no private right of action exists under the Attorney Act for damages for the unauthorized practice of law. We further hold that plaintiffs' restitution claims in the Jackson and Porter cases are barred by the voluntary payment doctrine. Accordingly, for the reasons stated, we affirm the judgments of the appellate court.
----------------------
Why is this significant, apart from the continued threat to the income of attorneys? Because of the rise of common interest housing and the inclusion in housing sales of a package of privatized services, responsibilities, and restrictions--all of which need to be fully understood by the buyer, which requires a lawyer to explain them. I think buyers need to be fully informed of how CC&Rs and an HOA or condo association will affect their expectations of home ownership. I'd like to see more lawyer involvement in explaining these documents, not less. These non-lawyer employees are not qualified, or allowed, to interpret or explain things. Having mortgage company employees doing what lawyers would otherwise do just increases the pressure to get the whole transaction over with as speedily as possible without bothering to secure full understanding by the buyer of what he or she is getting into.
Thursday, April 28, 2005
HoustonChronicle.com - Homeowners association sells woman's house
But all the CAI lawyers say this never happens...I guess somebody isn't telling truth. Who do you suppose it could be?
Pamela Bernhardt was close to completing renovations on a house she owned and hoped to sell. She had installed a new roof, new granite tops in the kitchen and new tiles in the bathrooEarlier this month, she arrived at the house on the 14200 block of Swallowfield in southwest Houston and found a small, yellow note stuck to the front door. The handwritten note said that the house had been sold at a foreclosure sale seven months earlier. The local homeowners association had sold the house, valued at about $250,000, saying Bernhardt failed to pay a $420 assessment fee.
m.
But all the CAI lawyers say this never happens...I guess somebody isn't telling truth. Who do you suppose it could be?
Pamela Bernhardt was close to completing renovations on a house she owned and hoped to sell. She had installed a new roof, new granite tops in the kitchen and new tiles in the bathrooEarlier this month, she arrived at the house on the 14200 block of Swallowfield in southwest Houston and found a small, yellow note stuck to the front door. The handwritten note said that the house had been sold at a foreclosure sale seven months earlier. The local homeowners association had sold the house, valued at about $250,000, saying Bernhardt failed to pay a $420 assessment fee.
m.
Home's green roof has a slant to it
Ah, the pleasures of fee simple ownership. Try doing this in your HOA:
Green roofs are sprouting up all over, but most of them are on flat surfaces and can't be seen from street level. But Lois Vitt Sale -- always one to shout worthy ideas from rooftops -- wanted her elevated garden to be visible. So she planted it on the peaked roof of the garage of her Downers Grove home.
Ah, the pleasures of fee simple ownership. Try doing this in your HOA:
Green roofs are sprouting up all over, but most of them are on flat surfaces and can't be seen from street level. But Lois Vitt Sale -- always one to shout worthy ideas from rooftops -- wanted her elevated garden to be visible. So she planted it on the peaked roof of the garage of her Downers Grove home.
Chicago Tribune | Police chief of Berwyn is indicted
Think HOA elections get contentious? Check out this story of election related violence in the Chicago suburbs, written by my friend and former editor, the inimitable Brett McNeil.
Berwyn Public Safety Director Frank Marzullo and four other men--including Marzullo's son, who is an assistant Cook County state's attorney--were indicted by a Cook County grand jury Wednesday on charges they beat a man April 5 outside a Forest Park steakhouse, authorities said.
Think HOA elections get contentious? Check out this story of election related violence in the Chicago suburbs, written by my friend and former editor, the inimitable Brett McNeil.
Berwyn Public Safety Director Frank Marzullo and four other men--including Marzullo's son, who is an assistant Cook County state's attorney--were indicted by a Cook County grand jury Wednesday on charges they beat a man April 5 outside a Forest Park steakhouse, authorities said.
Chicago Tribune | Poor seniors take on plans of condo giant
Mystery Reader sends along this link to an unusual twist on the familiar situation of tenant displacement due to condo conversion:
Dozens of immigrants from the former Soviet Union are getting a first-hand lesson in capitalism and market value as one of the biggest players in the Chicago real estate market gets a crash course in dealing with people who need government aid to find a place to live. More than two dozen elderly residents of Ontario Place, mostly Russians who immigrated to the U.S. a quarter century ago and have lived at the prime address since with the help of housing vouchers, picketed the building Tuesday to protest a deal that could send them packing. "This is our home," Leona Gaysinsky, a resident, said. "We know no other place. This is our community."Ontario Place, like many other downtown buildings, is going condo. American Invsco, the new owner of Ontario Place at 10 E. Ontario St., says it has done everything it can to help the residents find new housing nearby, but it now fights accusations by senior-rights groups that it is a Goliath throwing the elderly out into the street.
Mystery Reader sends along this link to an unusual twist on the familiar situation of tenant displacement due to condo conversion:
Dozens of immigrants from the former Soviet Union are getting a first-hand lesson in capitalism and market value as one of the biggest players in the Chicago real estate market gets a crash course in dealing with people who need government aid to find a place to live. More than two dozen elderly residents of Ontario Place, mostly Russians who immigrated to the U.S. a quarter century ago and have lived at the prime address since with the help of housing vouchers, picketed the building Tuesday to protest a deal that could send them packing. "This is our home," Leona Gaysinsky, a resident, said. "We know no other place. This is our community."Ontario Place, like many other downtown buildings, is going condo. American Invsco, the new owner of Ontario Place at 10 E. Ontario St., says it has done everything it can to help the residents find new housing nearby, but it now fights accusations by senior-rights groups that it is a Goliath throwing the elderly out into the street.
Wednesday, April 27, 2005
Philippine News Online: Condo sales lead property boom
MANILA – Filipinos are making the switch, with growing numbers of urbanites now preferring to live in residential buildings instead of single detached units. This, according to the chairman of one of the biggest property developers in the country.
MANILA – Filipinos are making the switch, with growing numbers of urbanites now preferring to live in residential buildings instead of single detached units. This, according to the chairman of one of the biggest property developers in the country.
Los Angeles Daily News:Condo market surges--
High demand, prices fuel construction, conversions
In the San Fernando Valley during March the median price of a condo soared an annual 19 percent, to a record $352,000, but sales rose 32.2 percent, to 493 transactions, the third-highest monthly total ever. By comparison, the median price of a single-family home hit a record $525,000.
--------------------
Every time I see these SoCal prices I have to look twice to make sure it says what I saw the first time. The median price of a CONDO is $352,000?? And sales are up by almost one-third? I would not want a variable rate mortgage on one of those. When the economy slows condos are the first properties to suffer, and if interest rates go significantly higher the combination of those two circumstances could spell trouble for a lot of people living in the Valley.
High demand, prices fuel construction, conversions
In the San Fernando Valley during March the median price of a condo soared an annual 19 percent, to a record $352,000, but sales rose 32.2 percent, to 493 transactions, the third-highest monthly total ever. By comparison, the median price of a single-family home hit a record $525,000.
--------------------
Every time I see these SoCal prices I have to look twice to make sure it says what I saw the first time. The median price of a CONDO is $352,000?? And sales are up by almost one-third? I would not want a variable rate mortgage on one of those. When the economy slows condos are the first properties to suffer, and if interest rates go significantly higher the combination of those two circumstances could spell trouble for a lot of people living in the Valley.
Tuesday, April 26, 2005
U.S. Prison Population Soars in 2003, '04 - Yahoo! News
Speaking of gated communities...
WASHINGTON - Growing at a rate of about 900 inmates each week between mid-2003 and mid-2004, the nation's prisons and jails held 2.1 million people, or one in every 138 U.S. residents, the government reported Sunday.
Speaking of gated communities...
WASHINGTON - Growing at a rate of about 900 inmates each week between mid-2003 and mid-2004, the nation's prisons and jails held 2.1 million people, or one in every 138 U.S. residents, the government reported Sunday.
Case No. 1-03-0378, Mikulecky v. Bart
Interesting opinion from the First District Appellate Court here in Illinois (that's the one that covers Cook County, including the city of Chicago). Issue: If a seller of a condo unit knows that the condo board is planning to approve a big capital expenditure, such as a major repair, that will require borrowing and levying a special assessment, but the BOD hasn't approved the plan as of the time of disclosure and even of the actual sale to the buyer, does the seller have to disclose that information to the buyer? Answer: You betcha; even though the expense wasn't approved, it was "anticipated."
Condos are creatures of statute. Section 22.1 of the Illinois Condominium Property Act says exactly what has to be disclosed, and it includes "anticipated" capital expenditures. Does "anticipated" mean "approved," as the seller argued? No, says the court. "Anticipated" has a commonly understood meaning. The fact that the seller knew about the planned expenditure through a letter from the BOD and also from going to a finance committee meeting was enough, and it should have been disclosed.
Interesting opinion from the First District Appellate Court here in Illinois (that's the one that covers Cook County, including the city of Chicago). Issue: If a seller of a condo unit knows that the condo board is planning to approve a big capital expenditure, such as a major repair, that will require borrowing and levying a special assessment, but the BOD hasn't approved the plan as of the time of disclosure and even of the actual sale to the buyer, does the seller have to disclose that information to the buyer? Answer: You betcha; even though the expense wasn't approved, it was "anticipated."
Condos are creatures of statute. Section 22.1 of the Illinois Condominium Property Act says exactly what has to be disclosed, and it includes "anticipated" capital expenditures. Does "anticipated" mean "approved," as the seller argued? No, says the court. "Anticipated" has a commonly understood meaning. The fact that the seller knew about the planned expenditure through a letter from the BOD and also from going to a finance committee meeting was enough, and it should have been disclosed.
My Way News:Herd of Buffalo Disrupt Traffic in Md.
PIKESVILLE, Md. (AP) - A herd of buffalo somehow got loose and wandered around an upscale neighborhood Tuesday, disrupting traffic and alarming homeowners before officers managed to corral them in a tennis court.
-----------------
Submitted for your consideration: Suburbia, once believed to have the best of urban and rural worlds, now officially has the worst of both worlds. Big city residents always gloat when there is an urban-type crime or other problem in a suburb. It is a schadenfreude carnival whenever there is a drive-by shooting in a suburb. "See?" they say, "Suburbanites can't escape bad schools/crime/fiscal collapse/traffic etc..." But now suburbia gets rural problems as well--a dad gum buffalo stampede. What's next? Potato blight? Boll weevils? Locusts?
PIKESVILLE, Md. (AP) - A herd of buffalo somehow got loose and wandered around an upscale neighborhood Tuesday, disrupting traffic and alarming homeowners before officers managed to corral them in a tennis court.
-----------------
Submitted for your consideration: Suburbia, once believed to have the best of urban and rural worlds, now officially has the worst of both worlds. Big city residents always gloat when there is an urban-type crime or other problem in a suburb. It is a schadenfreude carnival whenever there is a drive-by shooting in a suburb. "See?" they say, "Suburbanites can't escape bad schools/crime/fiscal collapse/traffic etc..." But now suburbia gets rural problems as well--a dad gum buffalo stampede. What's next? Potato blight? Boll weevils? Locusts?
Contrarians at the Gates Go to Some Heights to Make a Point
Fred Pilot forwarded this--you gotta love it...
Ten-foot-tall "viewing platforms" erected outside three gated communities are showcasing one Los Angeles group's social viewpoint. Guerrilla artists have erected gaudy, orange-painted towers next to the fences of private neighborhoods in Brentwood, the Fairfax district and Los Feliz to protest what they say is a proliferation of private, gate-guarded residential enclaves.
Fred Pilot forwarded this--you gotta love it...
Ten-foot-tall "viewing platforms" erected outside three gated communities are showcasing one Los Angeles group's social viewpoint. Guerrilla artists have erected gaudy, orange-painted towers next to the fences of private neighborhoods in Brentwood, the Fairfax district and Los Feliz to protest what they say is a proliferation of private, gate-guarded residential enclaves.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)